“Quid Pro Quota” is the apt title of an editorial this month in the Wall Street Journal (behind the paywall here). Here’s the story: Earlier this year, the Supreme Court was poised to hear oral arguments in the fully briefed Magner v. Gallagher, a case presenting the issue of whether a “disparate impact” cause of action may be brought under the Fair Housing Act. Related posts: TESTIMONY OF ROGER CLEGG, PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL, CENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY BEFORE THE U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS REGARDING THE PROPOSED EMPLOYMENT NON-DISCRIMINATION ACT The Center for Equal Opportunity on “Disparate Impact” at …
Happy Thanksgiving, and more
First of all, a Happy Thanksgiving to you and yours from the Center for Equal Opportunity! We at CEO have much to be thankful for this year, and that certainly includes supporters like you. One thing we would not put on our most-thankful-for list, however, is wacky interpretations of the civil-rights laws. Speaking of which … The Supreme Court granted review earlier this month in Magner v. Gallagher, which presents the question whether a “disparate impact” cause of action can be brought under the Fair Housing Act. Such lawsuits would allow plaintiffs to challenge housing-related practices that lead to disproportionate …
Title VI Can’t Be Used to Ban “Disparate Impact”
Title VI Can’t Be Used to Ban “Disparate Impact” Related posts: The Center for Equal Opportunity on “Disparate Impact” at Cato Disparate Impact Delenda Est “Disparate Impact” at Harvard Law School Disparate Impact Insanity