I was asked by National Review Online last week for commentary on the commemoration of the fiftieth anniversary of the 1963 “March on Washington” and Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.’s culminating “I Have a Dream” speech there. Here they are. Keeping Things in Perspective This Week: So, how much of what Dr. King was asking for 50 years ago has been delivered? Well, to help put things in perspective, here is the paragraph in his “I Have a Dream” speech where he spells out his movement’s agenda most specifically: Related posts: TESTIMONY OF ROGER CLEGG, PRESIDENT AND GENERAL COUNSEL, CENTER FOR EQUAL OPPORTUNITY BEFORE THE U.S. …
Hillary Clinton’s Voting-Rights Speech
Here’s a column by me recently posted on National Review Online: Looking forward to her run for president in 2016 and in an effort to bolster her bona fides with key parts of the Democratic base, Hillary Clinton gave a speech earlier last week on voting rights. In it she made two points, both wrong. Her first claim was that the Supreme Court erred in its ruling in Shelby County v. Holder, in which it struck down the coverage formula that is used for Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act. That formula is used to determine which state and local jurisdictions …
Beware Claims of “Racial Profiling”
In light of this week’s dubious court decision on New York City’s police department and racial profiling, it’s worth noting that some members of Congress are reintroducing that hardy (but never passed) perennial, the “End Racial Profiling Act,” which purportedly aims to end racial profiling by law-enforcement officers. This time around, the sponsors are trying to tie it in with, naturally, Trayvon Martin — even though the bill has nothing to do with the George Zimmerman case, since whatever you think of George Zimmerman and whatever he did, he is not a law-enforcement officer. In my statement before the Senate Judiciary Committee about the bill last …
Those New Voting-Rights Lawsuits by Eric Holder
Here’s an article that Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation and I wrote for National Review Online about the new voting-rights lawsuits that Attorney General Eric Holder has promised: The Washington Post reports that Eric Holder plans to file voting-rights challenges not only against Texas, which the DOJ did last month, but against a number of other states, too. These challenges are part of a crusade to, as Holder says, “use every tool” at the Obama administration’s disposal to continue federal oversight of the states in this area, despite the Supreme Court’s decision last month in Shelby County v. …
If/then on race relations
If we really want to diminish racial disparities in crime (which leads to racial profiling), If we really want to diminish racial disparities in education (which leads to university admission preferences), If we really want to diminish racial disparities in all kinds of other areas (income, wealth, employment, school discipline, you name it), If we really want to diminish all the racial disparities that, like it or not, make it hard to get rid of the remaining prejudice in this country – Then the single most important thing we can do is lower the out-of-wedlock rate for African Americans, which …
Some Thoughts on the President’s Emoting
Here are a few thoughts on the President’s impromptu remarks on Friday, in which he helpfully (?) offered his thoughts on African Americans’ response to the verdict in the George Zimmerman trial. 1. You can’t claim to be having a serious discussion about race, crime, and African American young men without mentioning — not one word — that 72 percent of African Americans now are born out of wedlock. That’s where the “soul searching” he calls for is most needed, not on introspection about “bias.” Growing up in a home without a father ties in with any social pathology you care …
The Zimmerman Verdict: No Surprises, Few Heroes, Many Villains
I am not someone who has followed State of Florida v. George Zimmerman with rapt, 24/7 attention, or even 8/5 attention. But it was easy for me to predict to a friend who asked me last Friday that there would be an acquittal. How could a jury possibly find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, after all, when the state’s own witnesses seemed to help the defendant’s case as much as the prosecution’s? The saga had many villains and few heroes. The foremost villains were the media — for more on that, see Linda Chavez’s pre-verdict column here – and the state …
CEO board member Rosalie Porter recommends new book
English for the Children: Mandated by the People, Skewed by Politicians and Special Interests–Johanna Haver’s new book, a scathing indictment of the educrats and legislators who forced a damaging education program on millions of children who enter our schools knowing little or no English. Haver’s sprightly, clear narrative documents the 30 years of “bilingual education,” its failure to improve the schooling of mainly Spanish-speaking children, and the intransigence of law makers to enact changes. Enter Ron K. Unz, activist/philanthropist who launched the English for the Children campaign that won 60% of the vote in 1998 in California (state with …
A Remarkably Silly Statement
On Sunday, June 30, a group of 37 organizations representing the higher education establishment took out an ad in the New York Times to run a remarkable statement, “Diversity in Higher Education Remains an Essential National Priority.” Here’s what’s most remarkable about it: According to theAmerican Council on Education, which coordinated the statement, it was issued “[i]n the wake of a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision [i.e., Fisher v. University of Texas] concerning the consideration of race and ethnicity in college admissions ….” Yet the statement itself does not mention race or ethnicity at all, not once. The only “diversity” mentioned is diversity …
Two Wins for CEO in the Supreme Court!
Last week the Supreme Court handed down decisions in Fisher v. University of Texas and Shelby County v. Holder. The Center for Equal Opportunity helped write and file briefs in both cases, and in both cases the Court’s rulings vindicated our arguments, as discussed below. * * * Lawyers on both sides of Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin are claiming victory, and there’s some logic to that: The big winners are lawyers generally. The takeaway from the Supreme Court’s ruling last week is that universities using racial preferences can expect more and tougher—stricter—scrutiny, to be hauled into court more …

